AGENTS
End-to-End Closed-Loop Auto Parking (ASPICE Scenario)
Full ASPICE-phased closed-loop AI validation for auto parking, from compliance pre-checks to vehicle demo.
Core Pain Points
- Complex cross-stage collaboration in automotive software delivery: Compliance pre-check, requirements, architecture, coding, testing, and vehicle demonstration involve multiple stages and roles — easily creating tool and document silos.
- High cost of traceability and evidence maintenance: Two-way associations need to be maintained across requirements, design, code, tests, and vehicle results; manually maintaining traceability matrices and design evidence is time-consuming and prone to chain breaks.
- Long integration-validation and on-site demonstration cycle: Software, system testing, and digital-vehicle deployment require multiple rounds of manual preparation.
Solution & Technical Implementation
- Compliance pre-check: Starts with ISO 26262/21448 and HARA as entry points, first completing safety and compliance constraint checks.
- ASPICE phased workflow: Sequentially executes system/software requirements analysis, software architecture design, implementation + AUTOSAR configuration, review + UT, and software/system integration testing.
- Knowledge-base retrieval enhancement: Each stage queries the knowledge base and records design evidence.
- One-click deployment + on-site demonstration: Deploys validation results to a digital vehicle, executes auto parking, and performs on-site closed-loop demonstration; retains human quality gates at critical stages.
Highlights
- Full-pipeline automation: Connects requirements, code, testing, and vehicle — with humans retained only at key quality gates.
- Whole-chain traceability: Provides a 7-layer two-way traceability matrix, targeting ASPICE 4.0.
- Knowledge-driven + evidence retention: Phase-based knowledge-base retrieval with complete recording of design evidence.
- Runnable and demonstrable: One-click deployment to a digital vehicle validates real closed-loop behavior.
Business Value
- Average end-to-end run time ~90 minutes; average Token consumption ~13M per run, with estimated cost ~USD 225.
- Per-module development cycle ~0.8 person-months vs. 2.0 person-months manually — efficiency improved by 120%.
- Can extend from auto-parking scenarios to cockpit, ADAS, body control, and more automotive-software domains.
- Turns the workflow, traceability matrix, knowledge evidence, and on-site demonstration into repeatable deliverable capabilities.